User talk:Vivekupadhyay1

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vivekupadhyay1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Futran Solutions, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —Alalch E. 12:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Futran Solutions[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Futran Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Alalch E. 12:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello Vivekupadhyay1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Futran Solutions, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Vivekupadhyay1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vivekupadhyay1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —Alalch E. 12:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Alalch E. I haven't taken any amount for editing or writing any of the articles or pages on wikipedia. If you need any futher details or have any questions, do let me know. Thankyou. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Vivekupadhyay1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Vivekupadhyay1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 331dot (talk) 12:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to respond to this? I haven't taken any amount for editing or writing articles. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 13:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to be specifically paid to edit to be a paid editor. Any paid relationship with a topic(including employment) triggers the disclosure requirement. Again, can you understand how this looks to everyone else? If you are a different person with the same name, that needs to be made very clear. If you are the same person, now is the time to be honest about it. 331dot (talk) 13:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot If you look at their user page history you will see that they made a declaration and then deleted it. nThis is not a usual type of behaviour, and it warrants explanation. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 13:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddle, you got me wrong. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 13:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you and others are thinking about me. But to be honest I'm different one. Not the one that is there on the Futran website. Thankyou. I think we should end this conversation here only. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will give you one final chance to be open and honest about your relationship, or lack thereof, with Futran. These questions need to be answered if you wish to continue editing. 331dot (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you wanted, I have done. I have added my own website's name and declared. I don't know why you think that the name of an employee which is similar to my name is me only. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 14:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to edit about a company that coincidentally has an employee by the same name as you? That's entirely possible- but can you understand why people might be skeptical of that, especially given your promotional edits about the company? What is the exact nature of Physics Alert's relationship with Futran? 331dot (talk) 14:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brother, I think for this conversation (What is the exact nature of Physics Alert's relationship with Futran?) we need to schedule an meeting where we can formally discuss. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 14:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works. This will be discussed in full view of the community. Wikipedia matters are not discussed off wiki unless the most sensitive personal information is involved. I don't want personal information, but the paid editing policy requires you to disclose "who is paying you to edit, who the client is, and any other relevant role or relationship. It does not matter whether you are paid directly by the client, or paid indirectly by an employer on behalf of the client." If you need time to consider your reply, feel free, but this is a Terms of Use requirement and not negotiable. If you don't wish to comply with this Terms of Use requirement, that's fine, but you will not be able to edit here in that case. 331dot (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I have already mentioned this ( This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that he has been paid by Physics Alert for his contributions to Wikipedia.) on my profile and now I dont want to discuss any further regarding the subject. And if you want and find me guilty go on and remove my editing access. Thankyou so much for your time and friendly discussion. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 14:20, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you have an unanswered question about your deleted paid editing declaration. Dissembling is likely to result in loss of editing privileges (0.95 probability) 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reinstating the declaration of paid editing. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have answered it brother. Please check once and let me know if you have any other questions that you think should be answered. Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 14:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have answered the question about paid editing. Thank you. I have no current questions for you. Others may have. I am, however, not your brother, nor do I wish to be addressed as such, please. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 14:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou, Gentlemen Vivekupadhyay1 (talk) 14:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Futran Solutions (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Futran Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vivekupadhyay1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Futran Solutions[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Futran Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

331dot (talk) 14:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have willfully declined to be fully open and honest with us about this, I have removed your editing access. Should you have a change of heart, or if you think I have gotten this wrong, please follow the provided instructions to make an unblock request. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]